Changes in participation and engagement
Prolonged absence, a sharp drop in activity, missed commitments or other changes from a person’s usual pattern of participation. A signal will invite attention without claiming to know the cause.
When a company, club or organisation has tens, hundreds or thousands of members, it becomes impossible to see how everyone is doing equally well. This product will help responsible people recognise early signals and focus attention where it is needed most.
The system will regularly review agreed indicators of general wellbeing and changes in member engagement. It will help identify where risk is increasing, a person’s connection with the community is weakening or support may be needed. A responsible person will review the context and choose a considerate next step. This enables an organisation to act earlier, before a member faces a problem alone, loses their connection with the community or leaves it altogether.
The organisation will define the purpose of care, permitted sources and signals, access rules and responsible responders before launch. Members should understand how the programme works and whom they can contact.
Prolonged absence, a sharp drop in activity, missed commitments or other changes from a person’s usual pattern of participation. A signal will invite attention without claiming to know the cause.
Short regular questions, a simple way to request contact and an accessible option for members to ask for help themselves.
Information from permitted internal systems and relevant public sources that may point to a need for timely attention. Every source and limit on its use must be defined before launch.
Changes across teams, chapters or the whole organisation without losing important individual signals. This helps distinguish a person who may need support from a systemic issue affecting a group.
Whether a signal was reviewed, who owns the next step, whether contact took place and whether follow-up is needed. Access to this information will be restricted by role.
A clear queue of situations requiring review, with an explanation of the signal, its recency and uncertainty, without automated judgments about the person.
Agree on the purpose, members covered, permitted data, signals, access roles, response process and how people will be informed.
Collect only agreed indicators, compare changes over time and build a community-wide picture for tens, hundreds or thousands of members.
An authorised person reviews prioritised signals, considers known context and decides whether a considerate contact is appropriate.
Reach out through an agreed channel, offer relevant support, record the next step and check whether the situation improves.
Clear changes and trends across a large community, so the care team can see where attention is needed now and where an issue is becoming systemic.
A prioritised list of situations explaining what changed, which data supports the signal and where uncertainty remains.
Named responsibility, next steps and follow-up oversight so an important signal does not disappear even in a community of thousands.
The product is being designed for people responsible for community wellbeing. It will help them recognise a need for attention early, review it respectfully and offer support before a member leaves or a problem deepens. A strong community cares for people consistently, even when membership grows very large.
Automation will help reveal community-wide trends and prioritise early signals. Responsible people will receive an explained queue of situations for human review rather than an unmanageable volume of raw data.
Only pre-agreed and permitted indicators from internal systems, voluntary wellbeing check-ins and relevant public sources. The purpose, data list, retention, access and response process will be defined before launch.
People should be informed about the programme rules, its purpose and available ways to correct data or request help. Personal information will be available only to authorised roles within the agreed purpose of care.
No. It will create an early signal with an explanation and visible uncertainty. An authorised person will review the context and decide whether contact is needed and what support is appropriate.